Editor: In the debate between the theory of evolution and the concept of intelligent design, it would seem that the use of logic has been forsaken. Logic is the most organized form of reason. The ability to reason is the single most important distinction between the human species, and all other known forms of life on this planet. Yet reason appears to have been abandoned by those putting forth the argument of intelligent design.
As I understand it, the basis of the argument for intelligent design is that forms of life are so complex that they could not possibly have come into being without the influence of a master creator. My experience as a software developer has given me insight into the flaw of that basis. Software programs can become quite complex, but the ones written by the best programmers are more clear-cut and straightforward. Unnecessary complexity in computer code can often arise due to a hodge-podge of uncoordinated efforts. A less complex and far more efficient result will be achieved by adhering to a well thought out and clear-cut design or master plan.
Albert Einstein, arguably the most intelligent human being to ever walk the face of the earth, believed in the existence of a higher being, and yet one of his most famous quotes is, "The beauty and elegance of Physics is in its simplicity."
When studying engineering and thermodynamics, one learns that the most efficient engine is the simplest one, and not a complex one with lots of moving parts.
Rather than the level of complexity of biological systems, which often seem half-assed and bewildering – and not the work of a very good designer, I would argue that the reality of abstract higher traits such as compassion, generosity, love and forgiveness is evidence that makes a far more persuasive argument for the existence of something more than we are.
Daniel Wells, Tracy